Real Talk on the Metaphysics of Gender

Philosophical Topics (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Gender classifications often are controversial. These controversies typically focus on whether gender classifications align with facts about gender kind membership: Could someone really be nonbinary? Is Chris Mosier (a trans man) really a man? I think this is a bad approach. Consider the possibility of ontological oppression, which arises when social kinds operating in a context unjustly constrain the behaviors, concepts, or affect of certain groups. Gender kinds operating in dominant contexts, I argue, oppress trans and nonbinary persons in this way: they marginalize trans men and women and exclude nonbinary persons. As a result, facts about membership in dominant gender kinds should not settle gender classification practices.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEMRTO-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-01-17
Latest version: 3 (2019-02-05)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Quine, Willard V. O.
Doxastic Deliberation.Shah, Nishi & David Velleman, J.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
He/She/They/Ze.Dembroff, Robin & Wodak, Daniel

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-01-17

Total views
4,044 ( #284 of 46,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2,061 ( #71 of 46,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.