Is intuitive teleological reasoning promiscuous?

In William Gibson, Dan O'brien & Marius Turda (eds.), Teleology and Modernity. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. pp. 185-202 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Humans have a tendency to reason teleologically. This tendency is more pronounced under time pressure, in people with little formal schooling and in patients with Alzheimer’s. This has led some cognitive scientists of religion, notably Kelemen, to call intuitive teleological reasoning promiscuous, by which they mean teleology is applied to domains where it is unwarranted. We examine these claims using Kant’s idea of the transcendental illusion in the first Critique and his views on the regulative function of teleological reasoning in the third Critique. We examine whether a Kantian framework can help resolve the tension between the apparent promiscuity of intuitive teleology and its role in human reasoning about biological organisms and natural kinds.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DESIIT-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-11-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-11-07

Total views
215 ( #24,475 of 56,924 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #8,818 of 56,924 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.