If There Were No Numbers, What Would You Think?

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):283-287 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Hartry Field has argued that mathematical realism is epistemologically problematic, because the realist is unable to explain the supposed reliability of our mathematical beliefs. In some of his discussions of this point, Field backs up his argument by saying that our purely mathematical beliefs do not ‘counterfactually depend on the facts’. I argue that counterfactual dependence is irrelevant in this context; it does nothing to bolster Field's argument
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-17
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
162 ( #32,373 of 2,432,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #20,489 of 2,432,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.