Presentism and the Experience of Time

Topoi 34 (1):265-275 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Presentists have typically argued that the Block View is incapable of explaining our experience of time. In this paper I argue that the phenomenology of our experience of time is, on the contrary, against presentism. My argument is based on a dilemma: presentists must either assume that the metaphysical present has no temporal extension, or that it is temporally extended. The former horn leads to phenomenological problems. The latter renders presentism metaphysically incoherent, unless one posits a discrete present that, however, suffers from the same difficulties that the instantaneous present is prone to. After introducing the main phenomenological models of our experience of time that are discussed in the literature, I show that none of them favors presentism. I conclude by arguing that if even the phenomenology of time sides against presentism, the latter metaphysical theory has no scientific evidence in its favor and ought to be dropped
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-09-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.McDowell, John
The Phenomenological Mind.Gallagher, Shaun & Zahavi, Dan

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
390 ( #6,054 of 37,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #7,318 of 37,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.