Human Identity, Immanent Causal Relations, and the Principle of Non-Repeatability: Thomas Aquinas on the Bodily Resurrection

Religious Studies 43 (4):373 - 394 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Can the persistence of a human being's soul at death and prior to the bodily resurrection be sufficient to guarantee that the resurrected human being is numerically identical to the human being who died? According to Thomas Aquinas, it can. Yet, given that Aquinas holds that the human being is identical to the composite of soul and body and ceases to exist at death, it's difficult to see how he can maintain this view. In this paper, I address Aquinas's response to this objection . After making a crucial clarification concerning the nature of the non-repeatability principle on which the objection relies, I argue that the contemporary notion of immanent causal relations provides us with a way of understanding Aquinas's defence that renders it both highly interesting and philosophically plausible
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Animalism.Bailey, Andrew M.
Animals with Soul.Thurow, Joshua

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
288 ( #15,251 of 48,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #8,901 of 48,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.