The Validity of Aquinas’ Third Way

New Scholasticism 45 (1):117-126 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues for the formal validity of and the truth of the premises and conclusion of a version of Aquinas' "Third Way" that says: If each of the parts of nature is contingent, the whole of nature is contingent. Each of the parts of nature is contingent. Therefore, the whole of nature is contingent--where "contingent" means having a cause and not existing self-sufficiently.

Author's Profile

Rem B. Edwards
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
392 (#41,555)

6 months
64 (#63,658)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?