The Validity of Aquinas’ Third Way

New Scholasticism 45 (1):117-126 (1971)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article argues for the formal validity of and the truth of the premises and conclusion of a version of Aquinas' "Third Way" that says: If each of the parts of nature is contingent, the whole of nature is contingent. Each of the parts of nature is contingent. Therefore, the whole of nature is contingent--where "contingent" means having a cause and not existing self-sufficiently.
ISBN(s)
0028-6621
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EDWTVO-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-12-02

Total views
113 ( #30,511 of 48,863 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #19,515 of 48,863 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.