The Validity of Aquinas’ Third Way

New Scholasticism 45 (1):117-126 (1971)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article argues for the formal validity of and the truth of the premises and conclusion of a version of Aquinas' "Third Way" that says: If each of the parts of nature is contingent, the whole of nature is contingent. Each of the parts of nature is contingent. Therefore, the whole of nature is contingent--where "contingent" means having a cause and not existing self-sufficiently.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-01-29
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
139 ( #30,989 of 54,517 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #27,094 of 54,517 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.