Regret Averse Opinion Aggregation

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is often suggested that when opinions differ among individuals in a group, the opinions should be aggregated to form a compromise. This paper compares two approaches to aggregating opinions, linear pooling and what I call opinion agglomeration. In evaluating both strategies, I propose a pragmatic criterion, No Regrets, entailing that an aggregation strategy should prevent groups from buying and selling bets on events at prices regretted by their members. I show that only opinion agglomeration is able to satisfy the demand. I then proceed to give normative and empirical arguments in support of the pragmatic criterion for opinion aggregation, and that ultimately favor opinion agglomeration.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ELKRAO
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-17
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-09-17

Total views
73 ( #49,840 of 2,448,747 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #36,649 of 2,448,747 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.