Citizenship and Property Rights: A New Look at Social Contract Theory

Journal of Politics 68 (3):544-555 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Social contract thought has always contained multiple and mutually conflicting lines of argument; the minimalist contractarianism so influential today represents the weaker of two main constellations of claims. I make the case for a Kantian contract theory that emphasizes the bedrock principle of consent of the governed instead of the mere heuristic device of the exit from the state of nature. Such a shift in emphasis resolves two classic difficulties: tradi- tional contract theory’s ahistorical presumption of a pre-political settlement, and its impossibly high demands on citizens seeking to practice self-rule. Kant’s solutions to these problems of property rights and citizenship are found in his political works, rather than the ethical works through which Kant’s political theory is usually interpreted.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ELLCAP-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-03-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-03-05

Total views
480 ( #6,108 of 42,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
91 ( #5,546 of 42,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.