The Argument from Imperfection

Philo 9 (2):113-130 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper argues that given the defining features of the God of “perfect being” theology, God would not create any contingently existing things. To do so would introduce a kind of gratuitous metaphysical imperfection in an otherwise metaphysically perfect universe. Given that in fact there are contingent things, it follows that the God of perfect being theism does not exist.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
563 (#27,751)

6 months
226 (#10,432)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?