Should phenomenological approaches to illness be wary of naturalism?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In some quarters within philosophy of medicine, more particularly in the phenomenological approaches, naturalism is looked upon with suspicion. This paper argues, first, that it is necessary to distinguish between two expressions of this attitude towards naturalism: phenomenological approaches to illness disagree with naturalism regarding various theoretical claims and they disapprove of naturalism on an ethical level. Second, this paper argues that both the disagreement with and the disapproval of naturalism are to a large extent confused. It then offers some proposals to set up an agenda for future collaboration.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FERSPA-10
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-05-31
Latest version: 3 (2019-02-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-05-31

Total views
659 ( #8,884 of 64,109 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #21,666 of 64,109 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.