Should phenomenological approaches to illness be wary of naturalism?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In some quarters within philosophy of medicine, more particularly in the phenomenological approaches, naturalism is looked upon with suspicion. This paper argues, first, that it is necessary to distinguish between two expressions of this attitude towards naturalism: phenomenological approaches to illness disagree with naturalism regarding various theoretical claims and they disapprove of naturalism on an ethical level. Second, this paper argues that both the disagreement with and the disapproval of naturalism are to a large extent confused. It then offers some proposals to set up an agenda for future collaboration.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FERSPA-10
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-05-31
Latest version: 3 (2019-02-16)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science.Petitot, Jean; Varela, Francisco; Pachoud, Bernard & Roy, Jean-Michel (eds.)
Illness.Carel, Havi

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-05-31

Total views
263 ( #11,948 of 40,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
74 ( #6,785 of 40,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.