New scepticism about science

Philosophers' Magazine 60 (1):51 - 56 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this essay I raise a dilemma for science journalists based on recent skepticism raised by scientists about the credibility of published results in many fields. Due to systematic biases in the publication record, most published findings in these fields (including psychology and biological subfields) are almost certainly false. So should science reporters stop reporting these findings, given their mission to report verified truths? Or should they report the findings while saying they are almost certainly false?
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
235 ( #17,595 of 47,226 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #34,257 of 47,226 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.