Pride and Moral Responsibility

Ratio 30 (2):181-196 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Having the emotion of pride requires taking oneself to stand in some special relation to the object of pride. According to agency accounts of this pride relation, the self and the object of pride are suitably related just in case one is morally responsible for the existence or excellence of the object of one's pride. I argue that agency accounts fail. This argument provides a strong prima facie defence of an alternate account of pride, according to which the self and the object of pride are suitably related just in case one's relation to the object of pride indicates that one's life accords with some of one's personal ideals. I conclude that the pride relation, though distinct from the relation of moral responsibility, is nonetheless a relation of philosophical interest that merits further attention.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FISPAM
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-08-03
Latest version: 1 (2019-08-15)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-12-21

Total views
272 ( #22,277 of 2,438,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #12,305 of 2,438,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.