On Hatzimoysis on sentimental value

Philosophia 37 (1):149-152 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Despite its apparent ubiquity, philosophers have not talked much about sentimental value. One exception is Anthony Hatzimoysis (The Philosophical Quarterly 53:373–379, 2003). Those who wish to take sentimental value seriously are likely to make use of Christine Korsgaard’s ideas on two distinctions in value. In this paper I show that Hatzimoysis has misrendered Korsgaard’s insight in his discussion of sentimental value. I begin by briefly summarising Korsgaard’s idea before showing how Hatzimoysis’ treatment of it is mistaken.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-02-24
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
95 ( #35,930 of 52,877 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #44,443 of 52,877 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.