The consistency of qualitative hedonism and the value of (at least some) malicious pleasures

Utilitas 20 (4):462-471 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this article, I examine two of the standard objections to forms of value hedonism. The first is the common claim, most famously made by Bradley and Moore, that Mill's qualitative hedonism is inconsistent. The second is the apparent problem for quantitative hedonism in dealing with malicious pleasures. I argue that qualitative hedonism is consistent, even if it is implausible on other grounds. I then go on to show how our intuitions about malicious pleasure might be misleading.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-02-24
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
427 ( #14,906 of 2,448,799 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #30,249 of 2,448,799 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.