The grammar of political obligation

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (3):215-236 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This essay presents a new way of conceptualizing the problem of political obligation. On the traditional ‘normativist’ framing of the issue, the primary task for theory is to secure the content and justification of political obligations, providing practically applicable moral knowledge. This paper develops an alternative, ‘pragmatist’ framing of the issue, by rehabilitating a frequently misunderstood essay by Hanna Pitkin and by recasting her argument in terms of the ‘pragmatic turn’ in recent philosophy, as articulated by Robert Brandom. From this perspective, the content and justification of political obligations cannot be determined in a way that is in principle separable from their application. This casts ‘political obligation’ not as a problem to be philosophically resolved, but as a political predicament that calls for a kind of practical engagement. The merit of this perspective is to draw our attention toward the conditions under which the problem appears as a lived predicament
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-04-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Language and Legitimacy: Is Pragmatist Political Theory Fallacious?Thomas Fossen - 2019 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (2):293-305.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
859 ( #2,358 of 40,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
121 ( #3,469 of 40,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.