The Heuristics of Fear: Can the Ambivalence of Fear Teach Us Anything in the Technological Age?

Ethics in Progress 6 (1):225-238 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper assumes that fear presents a certain degree of ambivalence. To say it with Hans Jonas (1903-1993), fear is not only a negative emotion, but may teach us something very important: we recognize what is relevant when we perceive that it is at stake. Under this respect, fear may be assumed as a guide to responsibility, a virtue that is becoming increasingly important, because of the role played by human technology in the current ecological crisis. Secondly, fear and responsibility concern both dimensions of human action: private-individual and public-collective. What the ‘heuristics of fear’ teaches us, is to become aware of a deeper ambivalence, namely the one which characterizes as such human freedom, which may aim to good or bad, to self-preservation or self-destruction. Any public discussion concerning political or economic issues related with human action (at an individual or collective level) ought not to leave this essential idea out of consideration.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-10-14
Latest version: 1 (2015-12-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
495 ( #9,181 of 53,647 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #10,712 of 53,647 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.