The Heuristics of Fear: Can the Ambivalence of Fear Teach Us Anything in the Technological Age?

Ethics in Progress 6 (1):225-238 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper assumes that fear presents a certain degree of ambivalence. To say it with Hans Jonas (1903-1993), fear is not only a negative emotion, but may teach us something very important: we recognize what is relevant when we perceive that it is at stake. Under this respect, fear may be assumed as a guide to responsibility, a virtue that is becoming increasingly important, because of the role played by human technology in the current ecological crisis. Secondly, fear and responsibility concern both dimensions of human action: private-individual and public-collective. What the ‘heuristics of fear’ teaches us, is to become aware of a deeper ambivalence, namely the one which characterizes as such human freedom, which may aim to good or bad, to self-preservation or self-destruction. Any public discussion concerning political or economic issues related with human action (at an individual or collective level) ought not to leave this essential idea out of consideration.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-10-14
Latest version: 1 (2015-12-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
368 ( #9,408 of 43,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
72 ( #8,657 of 43,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.