Religion and the Ritual of Public Discourse1

American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (1):74 - 92 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What role should religion play in public discourse? Not long ago Richard Rorty argued, in more than one place, that religion is a "conversation stopper" which polite people refer to only in private conversations. Religious believers complain, however, that this practice renders it impossible for them to participate in public discourse. They ask whether a democratic community is worthy of the name if it effectively forbids (by custom or legislation) a significant segment of its citizens from acknowledging and drawing upon their own traditions to help justify their moral and political claims? This paper draws upon the work of Jeffrey Stout, Robert Brandom, and importantly a Confucian understanding of ritual to argue that Rorty goes too far in arguing that religious assumptions have no place in public discourse.

Author's Profile

Warren G. Frisina
Hofstra University

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-11

Downloads
531 (#31,347)

6 months
89 (#50,227)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?