Our Incorrigible Ontological Relations and Categories of Being

USA: Amazon (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The purpose of this book is to address the controversial issues of whether we have a fixed set of ontological categories and if they have some epistemic value at all. Which are our ontological categories? What determines them? Do they play a role in cognition? If so, which? What do they force to presuppose regarding our world-view? If they constitute a limit to possible knowledge, up to what point is science possible? Does their study make of philosophy a science? Departing from the novelty –but no exclusively- of considering distinctions to be the subject matter of thought and language -that is, of reference and meaning- the author arrives at a radical novel conception of the ontological categories. The observations and arguments presented in it constitute a strong case against established and well-rooted tenets, if not paradigms, of contemporary philosophy, beyond ontology and epistemology. The entailing conclusions, open the door to a revival of the discipline and the importance of its studies, as the science of the constitutive elements of knowledge of a non-empirical nature.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GALOIO
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-03-24

Total views
513 ( #11,864 of 2,448,355 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #13,816 of 2,448,355 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.