H.O.T. Theory, Concepts, and Synesthesia: A Reply to Adams and Shreve

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In response to Fred Adams and Charlotte Shreve’s (2016) paper entitled “What Can Synesthesia Teach Us about Higher Order Theories of Consciousness?”, previously published in Symposion, I argue that H.O.T. theory does have the resources to account for synesthesia and the specific worries that they advance in their paper, such as the relationship between concepts and experience and the ability to handle instances of ‘pop-out’ experiences.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GENHTC
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Can Synesthesia Teach Us About Higher Order Theories of Consciousness?Fred Adams & Charlotte Shreve - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (3):251-257.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What Can Synesthesia Teach Us About Higher Order Theories of Consciousness?Fred Adams & Charlotte Shreve - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (3):251-257.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-07

Total views
92 ( #22,123 of 37,196 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #11,574 of 37,196 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.