H.O.T. Theory, Concepts, and Synesthesia: A Reply to Adams and Shreve

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In response to Fred Adams and Charlotte Shreve’s (2016) paper entitled “What Can Synesthesia Teach Us about Higher Order Theories of Consciousness?”, previously published in Symposion, I argue that H.O.T. theory does have the resources to account for synesthesia and the specific worries that they advance in their paper, such as the relationship between concepts and experience and the ability to handle instances of ‘pop-out’ experiences.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GENHTC
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Consciousness and Mind.Rosenthal, David

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-07

Total views
113 ( #23,023 of 40,654 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #24,228 of 40,654 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.