Why the Transcendental Deduction is Compatible with Nonconceptualism

In Dennis Schulting (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 27-52 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
One of the strongest motivations for conceptualist readings of Kant is the belief that the Transcendental Deduction is incompatible with nonconceptualism. In this article, I argue that this belief is simply false: the Deduction and nonconceptualism are compatible at both an exegetical and a philosophical level. Placing particular emphasis on the case of non-human animals, I discuss in detail how and why my reading diverges from those of Ginsborg, Allais, Gomes and others. I suggest ultimately that it is only by embracing nonconceptualism that we can fully recognise the delicate calibration of the trap which the Critique sets for Hume.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Kant and the Pre-Conceptual Use of the Understanding.Jonas Jervell Indregard - forthcoming - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
183 ( #20,195 of 45,289 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #14,509 of 45,289 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.