Is Kant’s transcendental deduction of the categories fit for purpose?

Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
James Van Cleve has argued that Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the categories shows, at most, that we must apply the categories to experience. And this falls short of Kant’s aim, which is to show that they must so apply. In this discussion I argue that once we have noted the differences between the first and second editions of the Deduction, this objection is less telling. But Van Cleve’s objection can help illuminate the structure of the B Deduction, and it suggests an interesting reason why the rewriting might have been thought necessary.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOMIKT
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Critique of Pure Reason.Schwarz, Wolfgang
Kant and the Capacity to Judge.Westphal, Kenneth R. & Longuenesse, Beatrice

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-09-27

Total views
1,100 ( #2,536 of 48,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
345 ( #1,006 of 48,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.