Is Kant’s transcendental deduction of the categories fit for purpose?

Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
James Van Cleve has argued that Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the categories shows, at most, that we must apply the categories to experience. And this falls short of Kant’s aim, which is to show that they must so apply. In this discussion I argue that once we have noted the differences between the first and second editions of the Deduction, this objection is less telling. But Van Cleve’s objection can help illuminate the structure of the B Deduction, and it suggests an interesting reason why the rewriting might have been thought necessary.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOMIKT
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-10-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-09-27

Total views
1,648 ( #1,946 of 58,371 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
348 ( #1,089 of 58,371 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.