Minding the Gap: Subjectivism and the Deduction

Kantian Review 23 (1):99-109 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Chapter 4 of Dennis Schulting’s book Kant’s Radical Subjectivism targets those commentators who take there to be a gap in the transcendental deduction of the categories, arguing instead that there is no gap between the necessary application of the categories and their exemplification in the object of experience. In these comments on the chapter, I suggest a minimal sense in which the fact that there is a gap is non-negotiable. The interesting question is not whether there is a gap which needs to be bridged, but how and why Kant makes the step from subjectivity to objectivity.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-03-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Kant and the Capacity to Judge.Westphal, Kenneth R. & Longuenesse, Beatrice

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
47 ( #41,953 of 48,953 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #30,595 of 48,953 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.