Cognitive modules, synaesthesia and the constitution of psychological natural kinds

Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):65-82 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Fodor claims that cognitive modules can be thought of as constituting a psychological natural kind in virtue of their possession of most or all of nine specified properties. The challenge to this considered here comes from synaesthesia. Synaesthesia is a type of cross-modal association: input to one sensory modality reliably generates an additional sensory output that is usually generated by the input to a distinct sensory modality. The most common form of synaesthesia manifests Fodor's nine specified properties of modularity, and hence, according to Segal (1997), it should be understood as involving an extra module. Many psychologists believe that synaesthesia involves a breakdown in modularity. After outlining how both theories can explain the manifestation of the nine alleged properties of modularity in synaesthesia, I discuss the two concepts of function which initially motivate the respective theories. I argue that only a teleological concept of function is properly able to adjudicate between the two theories. The upshot is a further application of so-called externalist considerations to mental phenomena
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GRACMS
Revision history
Archival date: 2010-08-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Modularity of Mind.Cummins, Robert & Fodor, Jerry
Functional Analysis.Cummins, Robert
Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes.Schwartz, Robert & Marr, David

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rethinking Synesthesia.Sollberger, Michael

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
673 ( #3,557 of 41,482 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #9,791 of 41,482 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.