Carl Schmitt, sportspersonship, and the Ius Publicum Ludis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I argue that sportspersonship is a means of performing fundamental sociality; it is about the conversion of a foe (inimicus) into an enemy (hostis). Drawing on Carl Schmitt’s distinction between enemy and foe – inimicus and hostis – as well as his discussion of the ius publicum Europaeum, I suggest a model of sportspersonship that sees it as expressing the competitive relations between equals that undergird the most minimal form of sociality; relations that any deeper union takes as its foundation. It is the performance of this fundamental sociality, I argue, that grounds the value of sport in general (though this does not mean that there cannot be other, contingent values in sport).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-08
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #59,453 of 65,543 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #39,277 of 65,543 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.