Social norms and unthinkable options

Synthese 193 (8):2519–2537 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We sometimes violate social norms in order to express our views and to trigger public debates. Many extant accounts of social norms don’t give us any insight into this phenomenon. Drawing on Cristina Bicchieri’s work, I am putting forward an empirical hypothesis that helps us to understand such norm violations. The hypothesis says, roughly, that we often adhere to norms because we are systematically blind to norm-violating options. I argue that this hypothesis is independently plausible and has interesting consequences. It implies, e.g., that some experimental paradigms for investigating social norms have hitherto unnoticed shortcomings.
Reprint years
2016
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HLOSNA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-08-26

Total views
249 ( #11,265 of 38,902 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
71 ( #5,559 of 38,902 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.