Social norms and unthinkable options

Synthese 193 (8):2519–2537 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We sometimes violate social norms in order to express our views and to trigger public debates. Many extant accounts of social norms don’t give us any insight into this phenomenon. Drawing on Cristina Bicchieri’s work, I am putting forward an empirical hypothesis that helps us to understand such norm violations. The hypothesis says, roughly, that we often adhere to norms because we are systematically blind to norm-violating options. I argue that this hypothesis is independently plausible and has interesting consequences. It implies, e.g., that some experimental paradigms for investigating social norms have hitherto unnoticed shortcomings.
Reprint years
2016
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HLOSNA
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-08-26

Total views
645 ( #7,251 of 57,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
106 ( #5,442 of 57,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.