Social norms and unthinkable options

Synthese 193 (8):2519–2537 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We sometimes violate social norms in order to express our views and to trigger public debates. Many extant accounts of social norms don’t give us any insight into this phenomenon. Drawing on Cristina Bicchieri’s work, I am putting forward an empirical hypothesis that helps us to understand such norm violations. The hypothesis says, roughly, that we often adhere to norms because we are systematically blind to norm-violating options. I argue that this hypothesis is independently plausible and has interesting consequences. It implies, e.g., that some experimental paradigms for investigating social norms have hitherto unnoticed shortcomings.

Author's Profile

Ulf Hlobil
Concordia University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-26

Downloads
1,443 (#6,499)

6 months
152 (#17,141)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?