Reading the Past in the Present

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Why is our knowledge of the past so much more ‘expansive’ (to pick a suitably vague term) than our knowledge of the future, and what is the best way to capture the difference(s) (i.e., in what sense is knowledge of the past more ‘expansive’)? One could reasonably approach these questions by giving necessary conditions for different kinds of knowledge, and showing how some were satisfied by certain propositions about the past, and not by corresponding propositions about the future. I take it that such is the approach of Chapter 6 of Time and Chance (T&C). Here’s another such a proposal, similar to that of, but significantly different from T&C; my purpose in this section is to highlight the differences, by showing how this account fails.
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUGDTP
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-04-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-05-28

Total views
194 ( #27,890 of 2,425,823 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #32,324 of 2,425,823 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.