Does Criminal Responsibility Rest Upon a False Supposition? No.

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Our understanding of folk and scientific psychology often informs the law’s conclusions regarding questions about the voluntariness of a defendant’s action. The field of psychology plays a direct role in the law’s conclusions about a defendant’s guilt, innocence, and term of incarceration. However, physical sciences such as neuroscience increasingly deny the intuitions behind psychology. This paper examines contemporary biases against the autonomy of psychology and responds with considerations that cast doubt upon the legitimacy of those biases. The upshot is that if reasonable doubt is established regarding whether psychology’s role in the law should be displaced, then there is room for future work to be done with respect to the truth of psychology’s conclusions about criminal responsibility.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUNDCR
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-01-17
Latest version: 2 (2021-01-17)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-01-17

Total views
37 ( #52,296 of 57,075 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #20,887 of 57,075 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.