Does Criminal Responsibility Rest Upon a False Supposition? No.

Washington University Jurisprudence Review 13 (1):65-84 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our understanding of folk and scientific psychology often informs the law’s conclusions regarding questions about the voluntariness of a defendant’s action. The field of psychology plays a direct role in the law’s conclusions about a defendant’s guilt, innocence, and term of incarceration. However, physical sciences such as neuroscience increasingly deny the intuitions behind psychology. This paper examines contemporary biases against the autonomy of psychology and responds with considerations that cast doubt upon the legitimacy of those biases. The upshot is that if reasonable doubt is established regarding whether psychology’s role in the law should be displaced, then there is room for future work to be done with respect to the truth of psychology’s conclusions about criminal responsibility.

Author's Profile

Luke William Hunt
University of Alabama

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-17

Downloads
223 (#58,859)

6 months
100 (#33,486)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?