Two Notions of Logical Form

Journal of Philosophy 113 (12):617-643 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper claims that there is no such thing as the correct answer to the question of what is logical form: two significantly different notions of logical form are needed to fulfil two major theoretical roles that pertain respectively to logic and semantics. The first part of the paper outlines the thesis that a unique notion of logical form fulfils both roles, and argues that the alleged best candidate for making it true is unsuited for one of the two roles. The second part spells out a considerably different notion which is free from that problem, although it does not fit the other role. As it will be suggested, each of the two notions suits at most one role, so the uniqueness thesis is ungrounded
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-01-26
Latest version: 2 (2016-06-20)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness and Quantification.Andrea Iacona - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (5):579-602.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
416 ( #10,328 of 50,101 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #19,830 of 50,101 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.