Valid Arguments as True Conditionals

Mind (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper explores an idea of Stoic descent that is largely neglected nowadays, the idea that an argument is valid when the conditional formed by the conjunction of its premises as antecedent and its conclusion as consequent is true. As it will be argued, once some basic features of our na─▒ve understanding of validity are properly spelled out, and a suitable account of conditionals is adopted, the equivalence between valid arguments and true conditionals makes perfect sense. The account of validity outlined here, which displays one coherent way to articulate the Stoic intuition, accords with standard formal treatments of deductive validity and encompasses an independently grounded characterization of inductive validity
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-06-22
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #67,296 of 70,235 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #27,596 of 70,235 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.