Weak Assertion

Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We present an inferentialist account of the epistemic modal operator 'might'. Our starting point is the bilateralist programme. A bilateralist explains the operator 'not' in terms of the speech act of rejection; we explain the operator 'might' in terms of weak assertion, a speech act whose existence we argue for on the basis of linguistic evidence. We show that our account of 'might' provides a solution to certain well-known puzzles about the semantics of modal vocabulary whilst retaining classical logic. This demonstrates that an inferentialist approach to meaning can be successfully extended beyond the core logical constants.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
INCWA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-05-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-10

Total views
36 ( #33,309 of 39,577 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #13,398 of 39,577 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.