Challenging the Grounding Objection to Presentism

Manuscrito 40 (1):87-107 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The grounding objection to presentism rests on two premises: (i) every true proposition P has a truthmaker T, and (ii) some claims about the future and past are obviously true. However, if the future and past do not exist, there can be no truthmakers for future and past tensed expressions. Presentists tend not to challenge the premises of the objection. Instead they argue that the present contains all the truthmakers we need. Presentists should challenge the premises instead. First, finding truthmakers in the present only results in the postulation of implausible and/or ethereal entities that ultimately fail to solve the grounding objection. Second, no manifestly absurd consequences follow from accepting the lack of truth-values for tensed expressions. Third, the grounding objection does not just require the assumption that for every truth there is a truthmaker, but also that for every truthmaker there is a truth. I show how one can deny the latter without denying the former.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-05-18
Latest version: 2 (2017-05-18)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Inconsistency in the A-Theory.Smith, Nicholas J. J.
Truthmakers Without Truth.Ingthorsson, Rognvaldur

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #33,469 of 38,881 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #22,734 of 38,881 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.