Relativist 'know': 'wh'-complements and intermediate exhaustivity

Proceedings of ESSLLI (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
We consider a puzzle in the question semantics literature. The puzzle concerns data when 'know' embeds interrogative complements. For the exhaustive strength in the literature known as intermediately exhaustive, first person ascriptions don't seem to exist, but third person do. By arguing against the only solution in the literature, we suggest that the puzzle is more interesting than previously thought. We provide a compositional semantics for 'know' where the interpretation of 'know' is relativized to an information state. The proposed semantics, we think, is compatible with relativism and nonindexical contextualism, but we opt for relativism for its relative ease in capturing disagreement data we provide.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-10-03
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
56 ( #54,855 of 64,256 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #13,331 of 64,256 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.