John Dewey and the Possibility of Particularist Moral Education

Southwest Philosophy Review 32 (1):215-224 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
John Dewey’s analyses of habit and tradition enable contemporary moral particularists to make sense of the possibility of moral education. Particularists deny that rules determine an act’s moral worth. Using Jonathan Dancy’s recent work, I present a particularist account of moral competence and call attention to a lacuna in particularism: an account of education. For Dancy, reasoning requires attunement to a situation’s salient features. Dewey’s account of habit explains how features can exhibit salience without appeal to rules, and I look to habituation to outline the possibility of particularist education. Finally, though Dewey’s commitment that habituation occurs in traditions seems in tension with Dancy’s rejection of principles, I argue that this appeal is consistent with particularism. Thus, particularists like Dancy can strengthen the case for their view by situating it in a Deweyan framework.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-07-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Particularism and the Role of Imaginary Cases: A Pragmatist Approach.Nate Jackson - 2016 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8 (1):237-259.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
115 ( #20,131 of 38,069 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #22,469 of 38,069 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.