Moderate Inclusivism and the Conversational Translation Proviso: Revising Habermas' Ethics of Citizenship

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Habermas’ ‘ethics of citizenship’ raises a number of relevant concerns about the dangers of a secularistic exclusion of religious contributions to public deliberation, on the one hand, and the dangers of religious conflict and sectarianism in politics, on the other. Agreeing largely with these concerns, the paper identities four problems with Habermas’ approach, and attempts to overcome them: the full exclusion of religious reasons from parliamentary debate; the full inclusion of religious reasons in the informal public sphere; the philosophical distinction between secular and religious reasons; and the sociological distinction between ‘Western’ and ‘non-Western’ religions. The result is a revised version of the ethics of citizenship, which I call moderate inclusivism. Most notably, moderate inclusivism implies a replacement of Habermas’ ‘institutional translation proviso’ with a more flexible ‘conversational translation proviso’.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JAKMIA
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Liberalism’s Religion.Laborde, Cécile (ed.)

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-12-21

Total views
21 ( #45,292 of 46,346 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #33,700 of 46,346 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.