Defending the possible consent interpretation from actual objections

Journal of Early Modern Studies 3 (2):88-100 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I defend the possible consent interpretation of Kant’s formula of humanity from objections according to which it has counterintuitive implications. I do this in two ways. First, I argue that to a great extent, the supposed counterintuitive implications rest on a misunderstanding of the possible consent interpretation. Second, I argue that to the extent that these supposed counterintuitive implications do not rest on a misunderstanding of the possible consent interpretation, they are not counterintuitive at all.

Author's Profile

Samuel J. M. Kahn
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-21

Downloads
677 (#32,722)

6 months
92 (#60,210)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?