Defending the possible consent interpretation from actual objections
Journal of Early Modern Studies 3 (2):88-100 (2014)
Abstract
In this paper, I defend the possible consent interpretation of Kant’s formula of humanity from objections according to which it has counterintuitive implications. I do this in two ways. First, I argue that to a great extent, the supposed counterintuitive implications rest on a misunderstanding of the possible consent interpretation. Second, I argue that to the extent that these supposed counterintuitive implications do not rest on a misunderstanding of the possible consent interpretation, they are not counterintuitive at all.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KAHDTP
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-08-05
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-07-21
Total views
228 ( #24,346 of 58,485 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #29,321 of 58,485 )
2017-07-21
Total views
228 ( #24,346 of 58,485 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #29,321 of 58,485 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.