The Guise of the Objectively Good

Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (1-2):87-99 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to one influential version of the derivation of Kant’s Formula of Humanity, the following claim is true: Agents necessarily represent their ends as objectively good. In this paper I argue that there is good reason to regard GOG as false. The paper is divided into four sections. In the first, I explain what is at stake in arguing that GOG is false. In the second, I explicate the terminology in this claim. I also contrast the claim with other possible claims one might make about how agents represent their ends. In the third, I argue that there is good reason to regard the claim as false and in the fourth, I consider a reply to the argument I make in the third section
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KAHTGO
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-07-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-06-10

Total views
205 ( #21,572 of 51,524 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #22,443 of 51,524 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.