Reasonable Inferences From Quantum Mechanics: A Response to “Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature”

Journal of Near-Death Studies 37 (3):185-200 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This invited article is a response to the paper “Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature,” by Jack A. Mroczkowski and Alexis P. Malozemoff, published in this issue of the Journal of Near-Death Studies. Whereas I sympathize with Mroczkowski’s and Malozemoff’s cause and goals, and I recognize the problem they attempted to tackle, I argue that their criticisms often overshot the mark and end up adding to the confusion. I address nine specific technical points that Mroczkowski and Malozemoff accused popular writers in the fields of health care and parapsychology of misunderstanding and misrepresenting. I argue that, by and large—and contrary to Mroczkowski’s and Malozemoff’s claims—the statements made by these writers are often reasonable and generally consistent with the current state of play in foundations of quantum mechanics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KASRIF
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-04-17
Latest version: 2 (2020-04-17)
View other versions
Added to PP
2020-04-17

Downloads
3,629 (#937)

6 months
521 (#565)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?