Aborting the zygote argument

Philosophical Studies 160 (3):379-389 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Alfred Mele’s zygote argument for incompatibilism is based on a case involving an agent in a deterministic world whose entire life is planned by someone else. Mele’s contention is that Ernie (the agent) is unfree and that normal determined agents are relevantly similar to him with regards to free will. In this paper, I examine four different ways of understanding this argument and then criticize each interpretation. I then extend my criticism to manipulation arguments in general. I conclude that the zygote argument is no threat to compatibilism.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KEAATZ
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-06-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-04-11

Total views
296 ( #21,707 of 2,448,494 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #36,913 of 2,448,494 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.