Iteration and Infinite Regress in Walter Chatton's Metaphysics

In Later Medieval Metaphysics. New York, NY, USA: pp. 206-222 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rondo Keele makes a foray into what he calls 'applied logic', investigating a complex argument strategy employed against Ockham by his greatest contemporary opponent, Walter Chatton. Chatton conceives a two-part strategy which attempts to force a kind of iteration of conceptual analysis, together with an infinite explanatory regress, in order to establish that one particular philosophical analysis is ultimately dependent on another. Chatton uses this strategy against Ockham in order to show that the latter's reductionist metaphysics depends ultimately upon a deeper level of realist assumptions that he can neither evade nor explain away. Keele then shows how, earlier in his career, Chatton found himself on the receiving end of this same strategy, defending his own highly original solution to the problem of future contingents from the very iteration-regress attack he would subsequently use on Ockham. Keele concludes with an examination of Chatton's attempts to avoid the consequences of his own strategy, and draws some connections between this argument strategy and modal collapse in modern logics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KEEIAI
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-01-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-01-09

Total views
9 ( #66,571 of 65,545 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #55,665 of 65,545 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.