Critical Thinking Education and Debiasing

Informal Logic 34 (4):341-363 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


There are empirical grounds to doubt the effectiveness of a common and intuitive approach to teaching debiasing strategies in critical thinking courses. We summarize some of the grounds before suggesting a broader taxonomy of debiasing strategies. This four-level taxonomy enables a useful diagnosis of biasing factors and situations, and illuminates more strategies for more effective bias mitigation located in the shaping of situational factors and reasoning infrastructure—sometimes called “nudges” in the literature. The question, we contend, then becomes how best to teach the construction and use of such infrastructures.

Author Profiles

Tim Kenyon
University of Waterloo
Guillaume Beaulac
Carleton University


Added to PP

127 (#86,117)

6 months
1,764 (#420)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?