Critical Thinking Education and Debiasing

Informal Logic 34 (4):341-363 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There are empirical grounds to doubt the effectiveness of a common and intuitive approach to teaching debiasing strategies in critical thinking courses. We summarize some of the grounds before suggesting a broader taxonomy of debiasing strategies. This four-level taxonomy enables a useful diagnosis of biasing factors and situations, and illuminates more strategies for more effective bias mitigation located in the shaping of situational factors and reasoning infrastructure—sometimes called “nudges” in the literature. The question, we contend, then becomes how best to teach the construction and use of such infrastructures.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KENCTE-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-11-28
Latest version: 2 (2014-12-10)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-11-28

Total views
1,201 ( #3,100 of 58,375 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
209 ( #2,243 of 58,375 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.