Can Moral Realists Deflect Defeat Due to Evolutionary Explanations of Morality?

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):227-248 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I address Andrew Moon's recent discussion (2016, this journal) of the question whether third-factor accounts are valid responses to debunking arguments against moral realism. Moon argues that third-factor responses are valid under certain conditions but leaves open whether moral realists can use his interpretation of the third-factor response to defuse the evolutionary debunking challenge. I rebut Moon's claim and answer his question. Moon's third-factor reply is valid only if we accept externalism about epistemic defeaters. However, even if we do, I argue, the conditions Moon identifies for a valid third-factor response are not met in the case of moral realism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KLECMR
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Natural History of Human Morality.Tomasello, Michael (ed.)

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-10-11

Total views
261 ( #13,239 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
88 ( #5,834 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.