Beyond Adaptive Preferences: Rethinking Women's Complicity in their own Subordination

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An important question confronting feminist philosophers is why women are sometimes complicit in their own subordination. The dominant view holds that complicity is best understood in terms of adaptive preferences. This view assumes that agents will naturally gravitate away from subordination and towards flourishing, as long as they do not have things imposed on them that disrupt this trajectory. However, there is reason to believe that ‘impositions’ do not explain all of the ways in which complicity can arise. This paper defends a phenomenological account of complicity which offers an alternative explanation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KNOBAP-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-11-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-11-23

Total views
12 ( #64,676 of 64,254 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #44,163 of 64,254 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.