Comment on David G. Anderson & Dmitry V. Arzyutov, “The Etnos Archipelago: Sergei M. Shirokogoroff and the Life History of a Controversial Anthropological Concept”

Current Anthropology 60 (6):741-73 (pp. 760-1) (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In response to Anderson and Arzyutov’s paper, I argue that ambiguities in the Russian social-scientific concept of “etnos” reveal its place in what I call a “field style” for thinking and doing science. Tolerance for ambiguity is, I suggest, a methodological strength of the field sciences. I support these reflections by also addressing the etnos concept’s origins in the complex history of Ukrainian nationalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-26
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #48,127 of 54,689 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,508 of 54,689 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.