Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger

Perspectives on Science 19 (1):81-115 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Joseph Rouse has drawn from Heidegger’s early philosophy to develop what he calls a “practical hermeneutics of science.” With this, he has not only become an important player in the recent trend towards practice-based conceptualisations of science, he has also emerged as the predominant expositor of Heidegger’s philosophy of science. Yet, there are serious shortcomings in both Rouse’s theory of science and his interpretation of Heidegger. In the first instance, Rouse’s practical hermeneutics appears confused on the topic of realism. In the second instance, Rouse suppresses Heidegger’s distinction between existence and essence, and hence fails to grasp the latter’s corollary distinction between scientic research and everyday practice. I argue that, by accepting a correction in his interpretation of Heidegger, Rouse would find the means to resolve the debilitating tensions in his stance towards realism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KOCGRW
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-12-23

Total views
138 ( #32,307 of 55,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #43,639 of 55,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.