The polemic between Leonard Nelson and Ernst Cassirer on the critical method in the philosophy

Folia Philosophica 35:53-69 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The subject of the paper is a polemic between Leonard Nelson and Ernst Cassirer mainly concerning the understanding of the critical method in philosophy. Nelson refutes the accusation of psychologism and attacks the core of the philosophy of the Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism. In response to those allegations, Cassirer feels obliged to defend the position of his masters and performs this task brilliantly. The present paper considers similarities and differences in the positions of both sides in this debate. I try to evaluate the arguments of both sides and argue that they took basically the same positions, while the existing discrepancies did not justify such an intense polemic. If the disputing sides had approached the discussion in a less emotional way, it could have led to substantive and interesting conclusions.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KUBTPB
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Abhandlungen der Fries'schen Schule.Hessenberg, Gerhard; Kaiser, Karl & Nelson, Leonard
Gesammelte Schriften.[author unknown]

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-11-11

Total views
110 ( #24,793 of 42,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #10,554 of 42,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.