The Priority of Public Reasons and Religious Forms of Life in Constitutional Democracies

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this essay I address the difficult question of how citizens with conflicting religious and secular views can fulfill the democratic obligation of justifying the imposition of coercive policies to others with reasons that they can also accept. After discussing the difficulties of proposals that either exclude religious beliefs from public deliberation or include them without any restrictions, I argue instead for a policy of mutual accountability that imposes the same deliberative rights and obligations on all democratic citizens. The main advantage of this proposal is that it recognizes the right of all democratic citizens to adopt their own cognitive stance in political deliberation in the public sphere without giving up on the democratic obligation to provide reasons acceptable to everyone to justify coercive policies with which all citizens must comply.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LAFTPO-8
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Why Deliberative Democracy?Gutmann, Amy & Thompson, Dennis
Justice in Robes.Dworkin, Ronald

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-12-21

Total views
25 ( #44,626 of 46,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #30,058 of 46,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.