Imaginative Attitudes

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The point of this paper is to reveal a dogma in the ordinary conception of sensory imagination, and to suggest another way forward. The dogma springs from two main sources: a too close comparison of mental imagery to perceptual experience, and a too strong division between mental imagery and the traditional propositional attitudes (such as belief and desire). The result is an unworkable conception of the correctness conditions of sensory imaginings—one lacking any link between the conditions under which an imagining aids human action and inference and the conditions under which it is veridical. The proposed solution is, first, to posit a variety of imaginative attitudes—akin to the traditional propositional attitudes—which have different associated correctness (or satisfaction) conditions. The second part of the solution is to allow for imaginings with “hybrid” contents, in the sense that both mental images and representations with language-like constituent structure contribute to the content of imaginings
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-03-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart.Gigerenzer, Gerd; M. Todd, Peter & Research Group, A. B. C.
The Transparency of Experience.Martin, Michael G. F.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Imagining Experiences.Langland‐Hassan, Peter

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
421 ( #9,388 of 47,221 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #19,306 of 47,221 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.