Differentiating philosopher from statesman according to work and worth

Polis 37 (3):550-566 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Plato’s Sophist and Statesman stand out from many other Platonic dialogues by at least two features. First, they do not raise a ti esti question about a single virtue or feature of something, but raise the questions what sophist, statesman, and philosopher are, how they differ from each other, and what worth each should be accorded. Second, a visitor from Elea, rather than Socrates, seeks to addressed these questions and does so by employing what is commonly referred to as the method of collection and division. Some scholars have argued that this so-called method is value neutral and therefore unable to address the question how philosophy differs from sophistry and statesmanship according to worth. This article contends that the procedures of collection and division does not preclude the visitor from taking considerations of worth into account, but rather helps establish an objective basis for settling the main questions of the dialogue.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2020
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LARDPF
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-11-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-11-20

Total views
224 ( #27,716 of 2,448,717 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #10,633 of 2,448,717 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.