Moral Constraints on Gender Concepts

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (1):39-51 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Are words like ‘woman’ or ‘man’ sex terms that we use to talk about biological features of individuals? Are they gender terms that we use to talk about non-biological features e.g. social roles? Contextualists answer both questions affirmatively, arguing that these terms concern biological or non-biological features depending on context. I argue that a recent version of contextualism from Jennifer Saul that Esa Diaz-Leon develops doesn't exhibit the right kind of flexibility to capture our theoretical intuitions or moral and political practices concerning our uses of these words. I then float the view that terms like 'woman' or 'man' are polysemous, arguing that it makes better sense of the significance of some forms of criticisms of mainstream gender ideology.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LASMCO
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-03-22
Latest version: 5 (2020-01-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Gender Puzzles.Fileva, Iskra

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-03-22

Total views
356 ( #12,107 of 49,034 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
169 ( #2,660 of 49,034 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.