The Motivation Question: Arguments from Justice, and from Humanity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Which of the two dominant arguments for duties to alleviate global poverty, supposing their premises were generally accepted, would be more likely to produce their desired outcome? I take Pogge's argument for obligations grounded in principles of justice, a "contribution" argument, and Campbell's argument for obligations grounded in principles of humanity, an "assistance" argument, to be prototypical. Were people to accept the premises of Campbell's argument, how likely would they be to support governmental reform in policies for international aid, or to make individual contributions to international aid organizations? And I ask the same question, mutatis mutandis, for Pogge's argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LAWQMQ
Revision history
First archival date: 2011-12-05
Latest version: 2 (2015-12-15)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Two Faces of Intention.Bratman, Michael

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-10-06

Total views
853 ( #3,773 of 49,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #10,844 of 49,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.