The Motivation Question: Arguments from Justice, and from Humanity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Which of the two dominant arguments for duties to alleviate global poverty, supposing their premises were generally accepted, would be more likely to produce their desired outcome? I take Pogge's argument for obligations grounded in principles of justice, a "contribution" argument, and Campbell's argument for obligations grounded in principles of humanity, an "assistance" argument, to be prototypical. Were people to accept the premises of Campbell's argument, how likely would they be to support governmental reform in policies for international aid, or to make individual contributions to international aid organizations? And I ask the same question, mutatis mutandis, for Pogge's argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LAWQMQ
Upload history
First archival date: 2011-12-05
Latest version: 2 (2015-12-15)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-10-06

Total views
1,033 ( #3,662 of 57,164 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
128 ( #4,203 of 57,164 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.